Nevada Timeshare License Practice Exam

If Bill is denied the chance to ride horses due to his brain injury, what might this indicate?

1. His rights have been protected under the law

2. He has no legal recourse

3. He could have legal recourse under the Americans With Disabilities Act

4. The owner is within their legal rights to refuse

The correct answer is: He could have legal recourse under the Americans With Disabilities Act

The indication that Bill could have legal recourse under the Americans With Disabilities Act suggests that the law is designed to protect individuals with disabilities from discrimination. The Act requires public accommodations — which would include businesses that provide recreational activities like horseback riding — to make reasonable modifications to their services to accommodate individuals with disabilities. If a business denies access to someone with a qualifying disability, such as a brain injury, it could imply discrimination, and Bill would have grounds to seek legal remedy under this federal law. The ADA aims to ensure that individuals with disabilities have equal opportunities to participate in public life, including recreational activities. Thus, if Bill’s brain injury prevents him from riding horses and the refusal to allow him to ride is deemed discriminatory, he could potentially file a complaint or a lawsuit because the ADA mandates that reasonable accommodations be provided unless doing so fundamentally alters the nature of the service provided. This context supports the idea that a legal pathway exists for individuals in similar situations to challenge discriminatory practices.